<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inventor Import for AutoCAD Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deelip.com/Index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deelip.com/?p=831</link>
	<description>My Views on the CAD (Computer Aided Design) Software Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AutoCAD</title>
		<link>http://www.deelip.com/?p=831&#038;cpage=1#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoCAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deelip.com/?p=831#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for this usefull autocad information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this usefull autocad information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Paul Waddington</title>
		<link>http://www.deelip.com/?p=831&#038;cpage=1#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Paul Waddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deelip.com/?p=831#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>&#039;Bottom line, I will write whatever the hell pleases me on this blog. The blog is mine, after all.&#039;

Please continue to so; every person in our industry needs to be interested, and will benefit, in knowing others&#039; points of view, even if opposed to them.

As for being treated as &quot;press&quot;, well look at the recent access to Autodesk&#039;s Bass and Kross.  Both these guys are as accessible as Fort Knox and as useless as a chopstick in soup to users with a grievance; but you got an interview and to publish their comments - I guess that is what &#039;the press&#039; does!

It is also why publications like Cadalyst have fallen by the wayside - too focused on &#039;sugar coating&#039; our industry; being glorified sales brochures instead of being a balance industry information sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Bottom line, I will write whatever the hell pleases me on this blog. The blog is mine, after all.&#8217;</p>
<p>Please continue to so; every person in our industry needs to be interested, and will benefit, in knowing others&#8217; points of view, even if opposed to them.</p>
<p>As for being treated as &#8220;press&#8221;, well look at the recent access to Autodesk&#8217;s Bass and Kross.  Both these guys are as accessible as Fort Knox and as useless as a chopstick in soup to users with a grievance; but you got an interview and to publish their comments &#8211; I guess that is what &#8216;the press&#8217; does!</p>
<p>It is also why publications like Cadalyst have fallen by the wayside &#8211; too focused on &#8216;sugar coating&#8217; our industry; being glorified sales brochures instead of being a balance industry information sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
